Question: Do you think nondisclosure agreements (NDAs) should be prohibited in sexual harassment settlements so that repeat offenders can be identified and stopped?
Answer: No, not banned, but the settlement process can be improved. It's not clear to me that banning NDAs altogether is always in the best interest of either the accuser or the accused, for the following reasons.
Some accusers choose to settle out of court, with an NDA, expressly to protect their privacy, avoiding the unwanted publicity, possible trauma and uncertain outcome of a civil or criminal trial. And some accusers like the certainty of a large monetary settlement offer, which would undoubtedly be much smaller without an NDA.
Sign up for Kiplinger’s Free E-Newsletters
Profit and prosper with the best of expert advice on investing, taxes, retirement, personal finance and more - straight to your e-mail.
Profit and prosper with the best of expert advice - straight to your e-mail.
As for the accused, there is the issue of false accusation–probably much less common than unreported harassment, but not unheard of. People who believe themselves to be falsely accused may choose not to fight an unfounded charge in a public trial if they can instead pay a modest monetary settlement, with an NDA to protect their reputation.
Besides proposals to ban NDAs in all workplace harassment settlements–pending in the legislatures of New York, Pennsylvania, California and other states–some worthwhile "middle ground" fixes have been proposed, too.
Women's rights litigator Noreen Farrell, for example, suggests that employers be required to disclose in any new sexual harassment settlement negotiation whether the same employee has been involved in prior settlements or complaints. That would strengthen the accuser's financial hand in a settlement discussion, or it could embolden her–now knowing she is not the only victim–to bring public charges and/or demand that the repeat offender be fired.
And an idea of mine to help deter bad behavior: Companies should add to their employment contracts with managers and executives a clause stating that anyone accused of sexual harassment will be required to share with his employer the financial burden of any settlement, out of his own pocket and/or by forfeiting future bonuses and stock options.
-
Ask the Editor, May 16 — Reader Questions on Capital GainsIn our latest Ask the Editor round-up, Joy Taylor, The Kiplinger Tax Letter Editor, answers three questions from readers on capital gains.
-
Delta’s New Fare Changes: What Travelers Need to KnowHere’s what travelers need to know about Delta’s fare changes before booking their next flight.
-
Airbnb Host Tells What It's LikeBusiness Costs & Regulation This Denver pharmacist began booking her ski condo a few months after the pandemic hit.
-
Tough Times for a Family BusinessBusiness Costs & Regulation His dry-cleaning operation was rocked by the pandemic, but he is staying optimistic.
-
IRS Gives Truckers a Tax Break in Response to the Colonial Pipeline ShutdownTax Breaks The tax penalty for using dyed diesel fuel for highway use is temporarily suspended.
-
Reliving a Harlem RenaissanceBusiness Costs & Regulation After a tough winter, two sisters look forward to reviving their restaurant’s business.
-
Add a VPN to Surf the Internet SafelyTechnology To help you fight identity theft, consider adding a VPN.
-
Stephanie Creary: Making the Case for Diversity on Corporate BoardsBusiness Costs & Regulation Adding underrepresented voices can improve a company’s bottom line.
-
How We Lose When We Overlook Black TalentBusiness Executives Comments from Wells Fargo CEO Charles Scharf (pictured) reflect a culture that tramples on clients’ trust and limits opportunities for people of color.
-
Retirees, Create An Emergency Fund for Rental PropertyBusiness Costs & Regulation Build a cushion to protect your income from an unforeseen crisis.
